Saturday 28 September 2013

Entry #3: Is Advertising Making Us Fat?




Although it may be easier for us to blame advertising for the rise in obesity each year, I have my doubts upon whether advertising really influences people to develop unhealthy eating habits. Last week I expressed my feelings on advertising and beauty, and how I believe that photoshopping an image to unattainable perfection has made a strong impact on our society, but I personally do not 100% believe that advertising deliciously unhealthy looking food has an impact on our society in the same way. McDonald's has been in business since 1940, and it is not news to our society that their food is terrible for our bodies. But why do we continue to eat it? Because it tastes good, it's convenient  and it's price tag is low and affordable. Of course advertising does play somewhat of a role in our decision making, as we are exposed to tons of food advertisements per day. But I believe, that it's really up to the individual who makes the decision to indulge in an unhealthy meal, as we are the ones in control of our own actions. I think blaming obesity on advertising is more of an excuse than it is a true factor. In this modern world we now live in, there are many advertisements for healthy living. I've actually noticed that nowadays, it  has become more of a fad, and more acceptable for an individual to obtain a healthy eating lifestyle and to eat organic, vegan, or gluten-free. We are all very much aware of what foods are considered healthy for us, and which ones are cancer causing, fattening, etc...so, why is there still a rise in obesity?

Obesity is now known as a form of addiction. It has been said that fast food with high calorie and fat content has the same effect on our brain's as drugs do. And this is what has led me to believe that advertising really has a small amount of responsibility on our societies obesity issue. An individual is going to make the decision to eat the way they want, no matter how many or little advertisements are out there for these food companies. I'm not saying that seeing a delicious fat burger during a television commercial won't spark anybodies interest, but I highly doubt that these commercials (or advertisements) really hold a gun to our societies head and command them to eat their products. I believe it's the taste, convenience and price of these greasy, salty foods that drive us to consume them. People are addicted to the taste, and no matter what, they're always going to eat it, even if they're aware of the effects it has on their bodies. So what I'm trying to say is that, advertising really doesn't force us to drive down to a fast food joint and pig out, we as human beings can make our own decisions, and we are the only ones to blame for indulging in unhealthy foods. There are also a variety of healthier options at most fast food restaurants such as salads, wraps, etc. So, why do people continue to eat the unhealthy options? Because they choose to! And to them it tastes better, and the taste is what drives them to consume it.

"The combination of fat with sugar, or fat with salt seems to have a very particular neuro-chemical effect on the brain...what that does is release certain chemicals that are similar to drugs, like heroin and morphine." – Ann Kelley, professor at University of Wisconsin states (link to article here)

I truly believe that food advertisements have no more impact than any other advertisements such as; clothing, cars, electronics, etc. Just because we're exposed to all sorts of new expensive electronics each day, do we go out and blow all our money on them? No, not likely (for majority of us anyway). So, just because obesity has become such an issue, it seems like it would be an easy target to blame advertising for the problem, when advertising really has little to do with our daily food intake decision making. I believe that obesity is much more complex than being exposed to food advertising, and it really has more to do with genetics, self-control, addiction, and lifestyle. 


As for children, I'd have to say that my view is a bit different. As children are so naive, and don't yet obtain the ability to realise right from wrong, so of course if they see their favourite toy being advertised on top of a McDonald's bag, they're going to want it! I remember as a child, begging my mother to bring me to McDonald's just for the toy (I had no interest in the food). I think that it's mainly the responsibility of the parents to teach their child that eating unhealthy food should not be a daily activity, and that it is more of a treat. So, in actuality it's not really advertising that should be held responsible for child obesity either, as the parent should be responsible and wise enough to not feed unhealthy food to their babies. In my experience, I have noticed that majority of obese adults, tend to have obese children. It's not very often you see a fit, healthy parent, with a physically unfit child. This is due to the parents' food decisions influencing the child, and educating them on proper eating habits! 

So, when it comes down to it, I think advertising has a small portion of blame on our eating decisions, and it's up to the individual to gain the will power to fight their greasy, unhealthy food wanting needs (or seek professional help when needed).  Like I said before, obesity is more than just about advertising, its much more complex and has many factors which contribute to it. We need to open our eyes and realise that our poor eating decisions have consequences, and it's only ourselves we have to blame, not advertising!

Sunday 22 September 2013

Entry #2: The Abuse of Photoshopping Advertisements


Plus-sized model Tara Lynn retouched for a print advertisement in V Magazine.
Read more: http://fox40.com/health-and-fitness/stories/fake-beauty/#ixzz2fahiPRhq



Once upon a time, before the late 80's when photoshop was first published, there was a time when women would flip through their favourite magazine and daydream of having the same beauty as celebrities in which they idolised obtained. Even before airbrushing, and retouching was a popular term known to the advertising industry, women (and men) have always experienced a time in their life in which they wish they could be, look, or act like someone else they assume is perfect. But nowadays, in this media savvy modern would in which we live in, there has become a much greater pressure upon the average woman to attain this perfect image which society has drawn for us. Photoshop has become such an essential tool in advertising and it seems that now the whole world is aware of what it is, and what it can accomplish. We are also aware of the damage is has caused to societies expectations of the average looking woman or man, and this is something that defiantly needs to be addressed before it somehow gets worse.


Now, I'm not denying that photoshop isn't a wonderful and useful tool. As a designer, photoshop is one of my most used applications that I tend to use on a daily bases. Photoshop gives designers and photographers the freedom to create beautiful things. But I do believe there is such a thing as abusing photoshop. There is a fine line between better-ing a photograph, and completely altering the image to the point where it can be defined as lying. What I'm trying to say is that, since photoshop has been used to death in majority of our advertisements, society has now raised the bar of beauty to levels of perfection which are merely just impossible for the average person. Since our societies expectations are so high, this is causing men and women to become much more susceptible to self esteem issues, eating disorders, addiction, depression, feelings of failure, and in extreme cases, thoughts of suicide. Since we are constantly being forced to gawk at all these images of perfect looking beings, we have come to believe that this is the way we should look, and if you don't meet these standards, well then you're not attractive. Which is so saddening, and quite disturbing to think about. Why has society decided that we should all fit into this "perfect" category? And that being thin, or having clear skin makes you an appealing individual? Why can't we all realise that if everyone looked the same, and all so perfect, our world would be such a dull, and boring place to live?


Furthermore, I do understand and believe that photoshop can be used to help convince someone to respond to an advertisement, and can also make it more visually appealing. There are ways of editing a photograph in such a way, which can help the consumers' attention, and make them want to potentially purchase the item that is being advertised. But I do believe that there is a way in which photoshopping an image to the extreme (such as cutting out areas of body parts) can be considered lying. Why do we have to cut off an inch of two of a model's waist? Does this really make a difference in whether or not the consumer will actually purchase the item? Or has society set such high standards of what women and men should look like, that is has become the norm to photoshop all photographs of models to the extreme? I think we all have come to realise that 99% of models' advertisements are photoshopped, and we all somewhat know in the back of our mind that these models don't really look this perfect on a daily basis, so why do we continue to make them appear this way? What kind of standard is this going to set for our future? Is it going to continue to get worse or will society finally realise that every body shape, and form should be appreciated? 


I can only hope for the latter, but the way media is expanding more and more everyday, I doubt there will ever be a drastic change in the photo-editing world. Photoshop is just going to continue to expand and become quicker and more efficient for photo-editing, and advertiser's are always going to take advantage of this product. All I can hope for is that it will get toned down a bit, and somehow in the future our model's advertisements can appear more real, and attainable. 

Saturday 14 September 2013

Entry #1: Sexist Advertising


Mic Mac Mall Ad Campaign: Sexiest or Not?




Honestly, I feel that these ad's are pretty insulting to women, as they are suggesting that women lack education and would rather spend their time shopping over learning. I'm not exactly sure why an agency would figure these would encourage woman to buy back to school clothing as the ad's may be quite offensive to certain women, and potentially discourage them from purchasing any items from the mall. I don't think the agency thought this ad campaign through enough, and they defiantly aren't going to draw their target audience in with these demeaning advertisements. If I were the owner of the Mic Mac Mall I would've felt a bit uneasy putting these advertisements up, and I most likely would've contacted the agency that designed them, and asked them to rephrase the ad's to make them less insulting towards women. I think that if these ads featured men as well, it would have potentially made it less sexist towards women because then they're not suggesting that only women prefer shopping over education. I feel that these ads are pretty poorly designed in general, it looks like not much effort went into the thinking process of designing them, and they just stuck a few cartoon women with clothing and added a crappy slogan to them. I think that the ads could of potentially been a lot better if the right agency had been designing them.

I don't think that these ads completely hurt the Mic Mac Mall, I mean, people are going to shop there anyways because they need certain things and if there's nowhere else nearby to get what they need, they're most likely going to end up shopping there anyway. If anything I think that these ads just caused a bit of controversy and attention towards the Mic Mac Mall, but I honestly don't think it is going to make them go bankrupt or anything like that. I think that the fact that they also went out and apologised for these ads really was a good way to get their customers to forgive them, and potentially bring back in the women, or men, who were insulted by these advertisements. The 5000$ cheque was also a nice gesture, to show that they truly care and are genuinely sorry for the mistake.

Overall, I do think these advertisements are a bit demeaning to women, but I don't think they would insult me to the point where I would refuse to continue shopping at the mall.

Popular Posts

romantica theme by Pink + Lola